tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33488833.post8863326277155393605..comments2023-11-02T02:14:31.901-06:00Comments on ReadMoreWriteMoreThinkMoreBeMore: NanophilosophyDoctor Jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13189506916480012553noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33488833.post-13424023205222954052009-11-02T12:08:24.126-06:002009-11-02T12:08:24.126-06:00Thank you.
http://nanophilosophy.org/origins-of-n...Thank you.<br /><br />http://nanophilosophy.org/origins-of-nanophilosophyDean Whitbreadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18035790691765014556noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33488833.post-75743911840497005752008-01-14T18:30:00.000-06:002008-01-14T18:30:00.000-06:00Well, Nano-technology has been one of the biggest ...Well, Nano-technology has been one of the biggest growth industries for the past couple years. I mean, if you're an engineer of physicist and you want money, your best bet is to go Nano. So, I suppose it's about time the social and human sciences went Nano-nano. (Mork and Mindy reference, sorry.) After all, we all know that the best way for the impoverished humanities to get any federal grant money is to attach themselves to the hard sciences, petitioning the powers-that-be that philosphy or literature's contribution to the NSF will help society more ethically and usefully integrate new technologies, even though we secretly know that 12-year-olds are probably way ahead of us. Really, nano-philosophy... sounds like a desperate cry for help.Steven Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07084929136238328365noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33488833.post-92005510558860663282008-01-12T15:52:00.000-06:002008-01-12T15:52:00.000-06:00Looks like nanosociology beat us to the punch:"Why...Looks like nanosociology beat us to the punch:<BR/><BR/>"Why Humans Have Sex":<BR/>http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/group/BussLAB/pdffiles/why%20humans%20have%20sex%202007.pdf<BR/><BR/>The most reported reason? "I was attracted to the person."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com